Add a Review Step to Self-Reported Skills
Give managers a structured way to review employee skill information instead of relying only on self-reporting.
Review employee skill claims with evidence, proficiency levels, targets, and readiness information so managers have a stronger basis for development and performance conversations.

Why Skill Evidence Matters
Employee skill claims can be useful starting points, but a claim alone does not show how the skill has been demonstrated, whether the recorded level is current, or how it relates to role expectations. Manager Skill Validation adds a review step so managers can consider the available skill information before using it in development and readiness conversations.
Manager Review
Manager Skill Validation gives managers a structured way to review employee skill information through team skills and the validation queue. Managers can consider the skill claim, available evidence, proficiency, targets, and readiness context before using that information in development conversations.
Start with the employee's recorded skill and the capability they say they have.
Review available skill evidence to understand how the employee has demonstrated the capability.
Look at the recorded proficiency level and relevant target expectations as part of the review.
Use the validation workflow to add manager review before skill information informs development or readiness discussions.
The skill claim shows what the employee records. Evidence adds supporting context. Proficiency describes current capability. A skill target defines what is expected. Manager validation adds a review step. Readiness helps show how that information relates to role expectations.
How Skill Proficiency Levels Work
A five-step workflow keeps the employee's skill information connected to manager review, readiness, and development follow-through.
Begin with the employee's recorded skill, proficiency level, status, and other available skill information.
Look at the skill record in context, including relevant proficiency, targets, status, and freshness information.
Review available evidence that adds context to how the employee has demonstrated the skill.
Use team skills and the validation queue to review the skill information and add manager validation.
Use the manager-reviewed skill context in readiness, development, learning, or performance conversations where relevant.
Benefits
Give managers a structured way to review employee skill information instead of relying only on self-reporting.
Bring supporting skill evidence into the manager review so the skill claim has more context.
Give managers a common proficiency reference when talking about employee capability.
Start development discussions with reviewed skill information, proficiency, and target context.
Use manager-reviewed skill information alongside targets and readiness views when discussing role expectations.
Use reviewed skill context to support goals, development plans, learning actions, or other next steps where relevant.
Explore Skills Features
Move from skill evidence and current proficiency to targets, manager validation, readiness, and development follow-through.
Explore Skills Management →Capture examples that show how an employee demonstrates a skill.
Document current capability before comparing it with expectations.
Define the proficiency employees are expected to work toward.
Add manager review to employee skill information.
Compare current capability with targets and role expectations.
Keep development actions connected to employee skill information.
Connected Performance Workflow
Manager Skill Validation belongs to the Skills product. It adds capability context that managers can draw on across PerformSpark workflows without replacing performance ratings or review decisions.
Connect feedback to strengths and development gaps.
Add skill context to feedback and make reviews more meaningful.
Turn priorities into measurable skill-based goals.
Clarify capability expectations during improvement.
Discuss skill progress between reviews.
Turn skill gaps into structured development plans.
Add broader input to capability discussions.
Provide context for recognizing demonstrated strengths and capability growth.
Support more consistent performance discussions.
FAQs
Have questions about skill proficiency levels? Here are the key differences between proficiency, evidence, targets, readiness, and performance ratings.
See how PerformSpark helps managers connect skill evidence, readiness gaps, and development actions with performance conversations.
Manager Skill Validation gives managers a structured way to review employee skill claims through team skills and the validation queue. The review can include available evidence, proficiency, targets, and readiness context.
Employee skill claims are useful starting points, but manager review adds another layer of context before the information is used in development, readiness, or performance conversations.
Skill evidence provides supporting context showing how an employee has demonstrated a skill. Skill validation is the manager or authorized review of the skill information. Evidence can inform the validation, but the two are not the same.
No. Proficiency describes the employee's recorded level of capability. Validation adds a manager or authorized review step around the skill information.
Yes. The Skills product includes team skills and a validation queue that support manager involvement in reviewing employee skill information.
Make performance reviews your growth lever
No credit card required • Setup and training included • Annual contract minimums may apply

Map employee skills, uncover gaps, and connect development to reviews, goals, IDPs, and performance.
JUST LAUNCHED
Skills Management is now live